Mario Quesada

I read an article on the subject of a tendency to use the word God by religious, politicians and ordinary people weather to say God send the earthquake and God protected the lucky survivors.
What to think about it?
I think what I think is healthier to think and I’ll tell you my version.
We usually tend to think by conditioning in terms of punishment and reward, we were domesticated by those treatments so we observe events on that same perspective.
By the same conditioning,, if you think in dualistic terms such as good and evil, you see “God” as the one that punishes or rewards.
So your thoughts and actions are driven by fear of punishment and need for reward. Not by spontaneous love, neither by the “intuition of your heart”. That’s an unhappy looser attitude.
That’s normal part-time happiness; ordinary thinking that shortens our life span and quality.
What is my personal choice?
What if I say that everything is always good?
What if I “convince my heart” to believe that evil is just an interpretation but doesn’t really exists?
I guess some may think I am evil or selfish.
I just choose to be free and happy.
The consequences of this different mindset allow me to get rid of so much unhealthy stressing resistance and thus remain joyful and serene.
Of course I’m aware that I won’t get everybody’s approval for this thinking but I rather pay that price than being uselessly unhappy.
I know already what’s being unhappy and punishing myself in order to avoid people’s disapproval. I don’t want that anymore.
So, you may keep thinking unhealthy moralistic thoughts or… choose to quit ordinary thinking and be the change you want to see in the world.
I’m sorry for the defenders of the common sense, weather religious believers or religious atheists, but for me, “everything is always good” is a wining thinking.
What I call God is the source of everything not just “desired” things. Not sometimes but all the time.
But the concept of God as the one who decides is incoherent.
That idea of God having emotions is a reflection of the social conditioning especially from religious culture.
As nature is morally neutral, The Source” is morally neutral.
I choose to think by useful convenience, that we are responsible for what we attract and also the way we feel and react to what we live.
Congruent with that conscious choice, God is the source of “good and evil”.
But if my relationship with source is favorable by the choice of my thoughts, beliefs, feelings, emotions and habits I may think God is all good.
Normal thinking would be that some events are bad, so they are punishments. That depends on the perspective.
There is no punishment if you don’t choose a victim perspective or moralistic judgments.
Yeah, I believe we attract painful events but not because we are bad, but because we are unaware of how we attract them.
Many survivors of the earthquake are going to outlive many others that are fortunate to live in countries where there are no earthquakes. Individuals are not condemned by the fate of many others.
In the end, many of our judgments are inaccurate because we can’t see the higher perspective. So we sadly resist.
I prefer not to argue with nature and I’ll do my best to have “a good relationship with God” every now and have a long lasting joyful youthful fulfilling human experience.
Well that’s a humorous ways to apply the principle that the higher the emotional experience, the more we are in vibrational resonance with our desires and in favorable conscious application of the law of attraction.
So the “more emotionally resilient we are” the more we attract desirable events.
The fundamental attitude we need is “loving what is”… ALL THAT IS.
If I spit upwards it is not God who wets my face. “God is The Source”  not The Judge.

Read Full Post »